STATEMENT
by the
Honorable Nydia M. Veláquez
Ranking Member, Small Business Committee
Hearing on Size Restrictions Calculations
February 27, 2002
In the aftermath of September 11, small
businesses across the country have borne a heavy burden
in responding to this national tragedy and working to
rebuild their community.
In Chinatown, which is in my district
on the Lower East Side in Manhattan, commerce dropped
by as much as 80 percent for some businesses. Businesses
across New York couldn't help but feel effects like
that when 100,000 jobs and 20 percent of Manhattan's
office space evaporated in two instants.
Thousands of businesses have sought disaster
recovery assistance from the SBA. Unfortunately, we
know that many of those companies have been turned away
because they are, according to current SBA size standards,
too big. We don't know how many small businesses never
bothered because they THOUGHT they were too big, but
the number could be considerable.
How the SBA determines what business is
"small" and "not small" is a critical
distinction. It often means the difference between survival
and collapse as divided by a very thin line. The current
size standards are like a lottery, picking winners and
losers based on often arbitrary distinctions --- which
we must now change.
We have known for a long time that SBA's
size standards need to be updated. September 11 has
only forced the issue. This unprecedented event has
flooded the disaster loan program with applicants seeking
recovery aid.
In December, we included in the Defense
Department Appropriations bill a provision asking SBA
to update its size standards. SBA did so, but the Office
of Management and Budget refused to accept those changes.
While OMB obstinately ignores our wishes, countless
businesses are suffering without assistance or remain
caught in arbitrary bureaucracy.
OMB has complained that adjusting new
size standards would be burdensome and complex. It is
difficult, they say, to determine what is small and
what is not small.
Well, this Administration had no difficulty
determining what constituted an airline or an insurance
company to qualify for disaster assistance after September
11. They made that decision in a matter of weeks. We
have known for years that our size standards need to
be revised, and we have given OMB at least the past
two months to come up with a plan.
We need to adjust the size standards to
make more small businesses like those in New York City
eligible for recovery aid. It follows the good choice
made by Administrator Barreto to open up the Economic
Injury Disaster Loan program to any small business affected
by September 11 while expanding these services to non-profits
and small financial institutions.
Whether we adjust the standards for inflation,
or region, or to respond to a disaster like September
11, the goal is the same. The Disaster Loans are designed
to help small businesses survive and rebuild after a
calamity. By sweeping aside the various existing size
standards, this proposal will go further to accomplishing
the core mission of the SBA --- aiding and assisting
small business.
It goes without saying that what constitutes
a small restaurant in Midtown Manhattan is not the same
thing for a small restaurant in Wamsutter, Wyoming.
But right now, they are treated as if they were the
same thing. As a result, one may benefit from disaster
assistance while the other does not. That needs to change.
Working together with OMB, I am confident
we CAN change those arbitrary distinctions that keep
more small businesses from receiving needed disaster
recovery assistance.